How to Choose RPC Provider in 2026: Alchemy vs Infura vs QuickNode

Why Choosing an RPC Provider Matters in 2026

Your RPC provider is the invisible backbone of your Web3 application. When it works well, everything feels smooth: fast loading, reliable data, predictable costs. When it doesn’t, you’ll notice it quickly — rate limits during peak hours, slow responses, or monthly bills that jump without warning.

The challenge is simple: every provider uses a different pricing model. What costs $50 on one might cost $500 on another for the exact same usage. In this guide, we’ll walk through the major providers, their strengths, and how to choose the one that fits your project without overspending.

The Big Three: Alchemy, Infura, QuickNode

Alchemy: Best Developer Tools

Alchemy focuses on making developers’ lives easier. Beyond RPC access, you get enhanced APIs, powerful debugging tools, and detailed analytics — all of which save time during development.

Pricing (2026): Compute Units

• Free: 30M compute units/month
• Paid: $20 per million CUs
• Simple request ≈ 10 CUs, analytics-heavy requests 50–75+

Rate limits: Adaptive based on compute usage and load

Chains: Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Solana, and more

Pros:

• Excellent debugging and monitoring tools
• Enhanced APIs reduce development time
• Strong reliability and uptime

Cons:

• Costs can be unpredictable
• Complex operations become expensive fast

Best for: Teams building complex products where developer efficiency matters.

Infura: Enterprise Standard

Infura has been around the longest and is widely used by large companies. It offers predictable pricing tiers and strong compliance features.

Pricing (2026): Daily Credit Model

• Free: 6M credits/day
• Developer: $50/mo
• Team: $225/mo
• Growth: $1,000/mo

Rate limits: Daily caps depending on the plan

Chains: 9 major L1s and L2s

Pros:

• Reliable, stable infrastructure
• Predictable, structured tiers
• Enterprise-grade support

Cons:

• Daily caps can cause mid-day throttling
• More expensive for similar throughput

Best for: Enterprises or teams that prioritize compliance and stability.

QuickNode: Performance Focused

If performance is your priority, QuickNode is often the fastest provider globally. It also supports more chains than anyone else.

Pricing (2026): API Credits

• Free: 10M credits, 15 req/sec
• Build: $49/mo — 80M credits, 50 req/sec
• Accelerate: $249/mo — 450M credits, 125 req/sec
• Scale: $499/mo — 950M credits, 250 req/sec

Rate limits: Guaranteed throughput per tier

Chains: 70+ blockchains

Pros:

• Fastest response times on average
• Clear rate limits — no surprises
• Broad multi-chain support

Cons:

• Can get expensive at scale
• Fewer advanced dev tools than Alchemy

Best for: Apps where speed directly affects user experience.

Specialized Providers to Consider

Chainnodes: Transparent Pricing

Chainnodes offers the simplest, most predictable pricing model — you pay per request, without compute-unit complexity.

Pricing:

• Free: 80M requests/month
• Team: $250/mo
• Growth: $1,000/mo

Best for: Teams that need fully predictable billing.

Helius: Solana Specialist

If you’re building on Solana, Helius often provides the fastest and most reliable experience.

Pricing:

• Free: 1M credits
• Developer: $49/mo
• Business: $499/mo

Best for: Solana-focused applications that require high performance.

Understanding Pricing Models

Each provider charges differently for the same operation. Here’s a simplified comparison:

Compute Units vs Credits vs Requests

Operation — Alchemy CU / QuickNode Credits / Chainnodes Requests

• eth_blockNumber: 10 CU / 1 credit / 1 request
• eth_call: 26 CU / 2 credits / 1 request
• eth_getLogs: 75 CU / 6 credits / 1 request

Why this matters: heavy analytics workloads become disproportionately expensive on compute-based systems.

Rate Limits: The Hidden Bottleneck

Your monthly allowance isn't helpful if your app gets throttled during peak usage. Rate limits determine how many users you can serve in real time.

Example: 500 users loading a dashboard requiring 10 requests → 83 req/sec needed.

Some plans simply can't handle this, even if they offer millions of monthly credits.

Performance: Why Milliseconds Matter

Small delays compound quickly when your UI depends on multiple RPC calls. Studies show every 100ms of delay reduces conversion by 1%.

Average Ethereum Response Times (P95):

• QuickNode: 95–120ms
• Alchemy: 110–145ms
• Infura: 125–160ms

On pages with many calls, these differences add up.

How to Choose Based on Your Project

Choose Alchemy if you:

• Need advanced debugging tools
• Have mostly simple reads
• Want the strongest developer experience

Choose Infura if you:

• Need enterprise reliability
• Prefer predictable pricing tiers
• Operate in regulated environments

Choose QuickNode if you:

• Care most about performance
• Are building multi-chain apps
• Expect high concurrency

Choose Chainnodes if you:

• Need predictable costs
• Have analytics-heavy workloads

Choose Helius if you:

• Build exclusively on Solana
• Need Solana-specific indexing and performance

Optimizing RPC Usage

Before upgrading plans, consider optimizing your architecture. Techniques like multicall batching, caching, and request deduplication can reduce RPC usage by 70–90%.

When to Consider Switching Providers

• Your monthly bills consistently exceed expectations
• Your app slows down during peak traffic
• You frequently hit rate limits
• Support response times are too slow

2026 Trends to Watch

• More transparent pricing from major providers
• Growth of specialized, chain-specific providers
• AI-assisted debugging and monitoring tools
• Decentralized RPC options becoming more reliable

Get Expert Help

At 5hz, we've helped 20+ teams choose the right provider, optimize their RPC usage, and migrate without downtime. If you'd like help evaluating your current setup, we offer a free 30-minute consultation.

Schedule Your RPC Consultation →